User agent detail

Mozilla/13.0 (SAMSUNG; SAMSUNG-GT-S8530/S8530XXLA1; U; Bada/2.0; xx) AppleWebKit/534.20 (KHTML, like Gecko) Dolfin/3.0 Mobile WVGA SMM-MMS/1.2.0 OPN-B
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/manufacturer-samsung-bada.yaml
Dolfin 3.0Bada 2.0Webkit 534.20SamsungWave IImobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebKit 534.20closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Dolphin 3.0closeBada 2.0mobile-browseryescloseclose0.187 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Dolphin 3.0WebKit Bada 2.0SamsungGT-S8530smartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 13.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Dolfin 3.0closeBada 2.0SamsungGT-S8530closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Dolfin 3.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.516 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
13.0WebKit 534.20 Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.403 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Dolfin 3.0Webkit 534.20Bada 2.0SamsungWave IImobile:smartyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.01 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:09 | by ThaDafinser