User agent detail

LG-LG220C[TF268435458416230421000000015123647440] UP.Browser/6.2.3.8 (GUI) MMP/2.0,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
LG220C Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.2 JAVA LGLG220CMobile Phoneyes0.03501 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
LG-LG220C closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.2.3.8close LGLG220Cmobile-browseryescloseclose0.195 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.2 LG220Csmartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UP.Browser 6.2.3close LG220Ccloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.2.3.8 LGLGLG220Ccloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Openwave 6.2 LGLG220Cmobile:featureyescloseclose0.012 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
close LGLG220CFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.02501 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:08 | by ThaDafinser