User agent detail

ELinks (0.10.6; Linux 2.6.16-hardened-r10 i686; 80x25)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_os.yaml
Linux 2.6.16 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
ELinks 0.10 Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.011 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
ELinks closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Elinks 0.10.6closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.264 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Elinks Text-based GNU/Linux desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
ELinks 0.10closeLinux 2.6.16closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
ELinks 0.10.6closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.057 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
ELinks 0.10.6 Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.414 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
ELinks 0.10.6 Linux desktopcloseclose0.016 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:08 | by ThaDafinser