User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; Win64; x64; rv:26.0.0b2) Goanna/20150828 Gecko/20100101 AppleWebKit/601.1.37 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/9.0 Safari/601.1.37 PaleMoon/26.0.0b2
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-811.php
PaleMoon 26.0Win8.1 6.326.0 unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
PaleMoon 26.0Goanna 26.0Win8.1 6.3Windows DesktopDesktop0.20106 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 9.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Pale Moon 26.0.0b2closeWindows 6.3desktop-browsercloseclose0.207 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Pale Moon 26.0Gecko Windows 8.1desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari 9.0closeWindows 8.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Pale Moon (Firefox Variant) 26.0.0closeWindows 8.1 closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Palemoon 26.0.0b2closeWindows NT closecloseclosecloseclose0.129 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Pale Moon 26.0.0b2WebKit 601.1.37Windows Windows NT 6.3closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.414 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Pale Moon 26.0.0Goanna 26.0.0b2Windows 8.1desktopcloseclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 9.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Safari 9.0.1closeMac OS X 10.10.5Desktopcloseclose0.01 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:07 | by ThaDafinser