User agent detail

XBMC/9.04-beta1 r19639 (Windows; Windows XP Professional Service Pack 2 build 2600; http://www.xbmc.org)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/desktop.yml
XBMC 9.04Windows XP desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
XBMC 9.04closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
XBMC 9.04-beta1closeWindows media-playercloseclose0.197 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
XBMC 9.04 Windows XPdesktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeWindows XP closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Windows Windows NT 5.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.415 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
XBMC 9.04 Windows XPdesktopcloseclose0.012 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:07 | by ThaDafinser