User agent detail

Opera/9.80 (Android 1.5.2.0-RT-20120926.155001; Linux; Opera Mobi/ADR-1201041826; U; xx) Presto/2.9.201 Version/11.50
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-aliyun.yaml
Opera Mobile 11.50Aliyun OS 1.5.2Presto 2.9.201mobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 11.50Presto 2.9Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.014 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 11.50closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera Mobile 11.50closeAndroid GenericAndroid 1.5mobile-browseryescloseclose0.187 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera Mobile 11.50Presto Android 1.5smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 11.50closeAndroid 1.5.2.0closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera Mobile 11.50closeAndroid 1.5.2closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera Mobile 11.50closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.065 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 11.50Presto 2.9.201Android 1.5.2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.412 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Mobile 11.50Presto 2.9.201Aliyun OS 1.5.2mobile:smartyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 11.50closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera Mobile 11closeAndroid 1.5Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:07 | by ThaDafinser