User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.1.1; GT-I9260 Build/JRO03C) AppleWebKit/535.19 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/18.0.1025.166 Mobile
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungGT-I9260 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 18.0WebKit Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.06802 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 18.0.1025.166closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Mobile Safari closeAndroid 4.1.1SamsungGT-I9260mobile-browseryescloseclose0.255 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome Mobile 18.0WebKit Android 4.1SamsungGT-I9260smartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 18.0.1025.166closeAndroid 4.1.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 18.0.1025closeAndroid 4.1.1SamsungGT-I9260closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.1.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.068 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 18.0.1025.166WebKit 535.19Android 4.1.1Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.406 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 18Webkit 535.19Android 4.1.1SamsungGalaxy Premiermobile:smartyescloseclose0.028 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 18closeAndroid 4.1SamsungGT-I9260Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.04501 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:07 | by ThaDafinser