User agent detail

Spice Mi350n Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 2.3.4; en-us; DESIRE_HD Build/ALPS.GB.FDD2.MP.V2.14) AppleWebKit/533.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Mobile Safari/533.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
HTCDESIRE HD Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android 4.0WebKit Android 2.3Mobile Phoneyesyes0.012 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 2.3.4GenericAndroid 2.3mobile-browseryescloseclose0.248 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 2.3HTCDESIRE HDsmartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 2.3.4closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 2.3.4closeAndroid 2.3.4HTCDESIRE HDcloseclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 2.3.4closecloseclosecloseclose0.067 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser 4.0WebKit 533.1Android 2.3.4HTC Desire HDcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.412 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Webkit 533.1Android 2.3.4HTCDesire HDmobile:smartyescloseclose0.017 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 2.3closeAndroid 2.3Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.04601 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:07 | by ThaDafinser