User agent detail

UCWEB/2.0 (Java; U; MIDP-2.0; ru; nokiaasha500dualsim) U2/1.0.0 UCBrowser/9.2.0.311 U2/1.0.0 Mobile UNTRUSTED/1.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-635.php
UC Browser 9.2JAVA unknownunknown NokiaAsha 500 Dual SimMobile Phoneyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 9.2U2 JAVA NokiaAsha 500 Dual SimMobile Phoneyesyes0.007 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
UCWEB 2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser close GenericJ2ME Midletmobile-browseryescloseclose0.195 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 9.2 Symbian Nokiaasha500dualsimsmartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Nokia Browser 1.0.0closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 9.2.0close closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 2.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.053 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 9.2.0.311 NokiaMobilecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.412 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 9.2Gecko Nokia Asha Platform 1.0NokiaAsha 500mobile:featureyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 8closeAndroid 4.0Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.009 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:06 | by ThaDafinser