User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android GFIVE-4.0; en-us; GFIVE A77 Build/GRK39F) AppleWebKit/533.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Mobile Safari/533.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
GfiveA77 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android 4.0WebKit Android Mobile Phoneyesyes0.13904 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid GenericAndroidmobile-browseryescloseclose0.287 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android yes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Safari 4.0closeAndroid GfiveA77closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid closecloseclosecloseclose0.061 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser 4.0WebKit 533.1Android closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.419 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Webkit 533.1Android 2.3.6GFIVE A77mobile:smartyescloseclose0.079 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android 3.6closeAndroid 3.6Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.05302 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:06 | by ThaDafinser