User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; xx; rv:1.5a) Gecko/20030728 Mozilla Firebird/0.6.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-firefox.yaml
Firebird 0.6.1Windows 7Gecko 1.5desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Mozilla 1.5Gecko 1.5 Desktop0.08703 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Firebird (old name for Firefox) 0.6.1closeWindows 6.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.214 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Firebird 0.6Gecko Windows 7desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firebird 0.6.1closeWindows 7closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeWindows 7 closeclosecloseclose0.012 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Firebird 0.6.1closeWindows 7 closecloseclosecloseclose0.168 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Firebird 0.6.1Gecko 20030728Windows Windows NT 6.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.408 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Firebird 0.6.1Gecko 1.5Windows 7desktopcloseclose0.009 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:05 | by ThaDafinser