User agent detail

MOT-ta02/06.04.2fr_columbia_3mnc_fix MIB/1.2.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
Motorolata02 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Motorola Internet Browser 1.2 MotorolaTA02Mobile Phoneyes0.015 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MOT-ta02 06.04.2frcloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Motorola Internet Browser 1.2.1close MotorolaC330/C333/C336mobile-browseryescloseclose0.192 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Motorolata02smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close Motorolata02closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
MIB 1.2.1close closecloseclosecloseclose0.162 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
No result found
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Motorola Internet Browser 1.2.1 Motorolata02mobile:featureyescloseclose0.01 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
close MotorolaC330/C333/C336Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.02301 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:04 | by ThaDafinser