User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10_5_5; en-us) AppleWebKit/525.18 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.1.2 Safari/525.20.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/camouflage.yaml
Safari 3.1.2Mac OS X 10.5Webkit 525.18desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Safari 3.1WebKit MacOSX 10.5AppleMacintoshDesktop0.01801 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 3.1.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari 3.1.2closeOS X 10.5.5desktop-browsercloseclose0.196 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Safari 3.1WebKit Mac 10.5desktop0.01 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari 3.1.2closeOS X 10.5.5closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Safari 3.1.2closeMac OS X 10.5.5closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari 3.1.2closeOS X 10.5.5closecloseclosecloseclose0.066 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Safari 3.1.2WebKit 525.18Mac OS X 10.5.5closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.417 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Safari 3.1.2Webkit 525.18Mac OS X 10.5desktopcloseclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 3.1.2closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Safari 3.0.4closeMac OS X Desktopcloseclose0.008 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:04 | by ThaDafinser