User agent detail

Opera Mini 4/SAMSUNG-SGH-F480I-Vodafone/AMJB1 SHP/VPP/R5 NetFront/3.5 NexPlayer/2.9.1 SMM-MMS/1.2.0 profile/MIDP-2.0 configuration/CLDC-1.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungSGH-F480I-Vodafone Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
NetFront 3.5NetFront Mobile Deviceyes0.016 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera Minicloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
NetFront 3.5closeJVM AccessNetFront Ver. 3.5mobile-browseryescloseclose0.186 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
NexPlayer 2.9 SamsungSGH-F480Ismartphoneyes0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera Mini SAMSUNG-SGH-F480I-Vodafoneclose closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
NetFront 3.5close SamsungSGH-F480I-Vodafonecloseclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera Mini close closecloseclosecloseclose0.058 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera Mini Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
NetFront 3.5 Touchwiz SamsungToccomobile:featureyescloseclose0.006 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
NetFront 3.5close AccessNetFront Ver. 3.5Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.018 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:03 | by ThaDafinser