User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.0; baidu Transcoder;)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/Parser/fixtures/bots.yml
Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
IE 6.0Trident Win2000 5.0Windows DesktopDesktop0.013 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 6.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IE 6.0closeWindows 5.0desktop-browsercloseclose0.182 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
yesBaidu SpiderSearch bot0.002 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 6.0closeWindows 2000closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
IE 6.0closeWindows 2000 closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Internet Explorer 6.0closeWindows 2000 closecloseclosecloseclose0.045 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet Explorer 6.0Trident Windows Windows NT 5.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.401 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Internet Explorer 6.0 Windows 2000desktopcloseclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 6.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close yescloseclose0.008 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:03 | by ThaDafinser