User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.1.2; i-mobile i-STYLE 7 Build/JZO54K) AppleWebKit/534.30 (KHTML, like Gecko) FlyFlow/2.0 Version/4.0 Mobile Safari/534.30
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
imobilei-STYLE 7 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
FlyFlow WebKit Android 4.1Mobile Phoneyesyes0.075 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.1.2GenericAndroid 4.1mobile-browseryescloseclose0.298 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 4.1i-mobilei-Style 7smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 4.1.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Baidu Explorer 2.0closeAndroid 4.1.2imobilei-STYLE 7closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.1.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.108 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser 4.0WebKit 534.30Android 4.1.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.425 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Baidu Browser 2.0Webkit 534.30Android 4.1.2i-Mobilei-Style 7mobile:smartyescloseclose0.038 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.1closeAndroid 4.1Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.043 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:03 | by ThaDafinser