User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.2.2; Zh-cn;GiONEE-V182/V182 Build/IMM76D) AppleWebKit534.30(KHTML,like Gecko)Version/4.0 Mobile Safari/534.30 Id/D8F84E0E4B9C906E32D90C9098B00EF6 RV/4.2.0 GNBR/1.7.1.ai (securitypay,securityinstalled)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
GioneeV182 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Version 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.2.2GenericAndroid 4.2mobile-browseryescloseclose0.262 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 4.2GioneeV182smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 4.2.2closeAndroid 4.2.2GioneeV182closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.077 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser 4.0WebKit Android 4.2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.424 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Android 4.0.4GioneeV182mobile:smartyescloseclose0.013 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.2closeAndroid 4.2Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.049 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:02 | by ThaDafinser