User agent detail

Nokia206/2.0 (04.52) Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 UCWEB/2.0 (Java; U; MIDP-2.0; en-US; Nokia206) U2/1.0.0 UCBrowser/9.5.0.449 U2/1.0.0 Mobile
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-687.php
UC Browser 9.5JAVA unknownunknown Nokia206Mobile Phoneyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 9.5U2 JAVA Nokia206Mobile Phoneyes0.008 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Nokia206 2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser close Nokia206mobile-browseryescloseclose0.198 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 9.5 Symbian Nokia206smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Nokia Browser 2.0closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 9.5.0close Nokia206closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 2.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.064 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 9.5.0.449 NokiaOS NokiaNokia 206closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.429 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 9.5Gecko Series40 NokiaAsha 206mobile:featureyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Nokia206Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.012 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:01 | by ThaDafinser