User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/31.0.1626.1 Safari/537.36 AppEngine-Google; (+http://code.google.com/appengine; appid: s~hex-plus)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/bots/generic.yaml
yesGoogle App Engine Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 31.0Blink Win8 6.2Windows DesktopDesktop0.074 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 31.0.1626.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 31.0.1626.1closeWindows 6.2desktop-browsercloseclose0.205 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 31.0Blink Windows 8desktop0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 31.0.1626.1closeWindows 8closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesAppEngine-Googleclose0.011 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 31.0.1626.1closeWindows 8 closecloseclosecloseclose0.158 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 31.0.1626.1WebKit 537.36Windows Windows NT 6.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.409 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
closeyesGoogle App Engineclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closecloseclosecloseclosecloseyesGoogle AppEngineclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 31.0.1650.63closeLinux i686 Desktopcloseclose0.016 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:01 | by ThaDafinser