User agent detail

android 4.2.2; SAMSUNG-SGH-I527
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungSGH-I527 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
android closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
close SamsungSGH-I527mobile-browseryescloseclose0.189 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 4.2SamsungSGH-I527smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close SamsungSGH-I527closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Stock Android Browser Android 4.2.2Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.411 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
SamsungSGH-I527mobile:featureyescloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.014 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:01 | by ThaDafinser