User agent detail

Opera/9.80 (Windows NT 5.2; U; Edition Labs HTML5 Parser; xx) Presto/2.9.181 Version/12.00
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-opera.yaml
Opera Labs 12.00Windows Server 2003Presto 2.9.181desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 12.00Presto 2.12WinXP 5.2Windows DesktopDesktop0.007 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 12.00closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 12.00closeWindows 5.2desktop-browsercloseclose0.193 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 12.00Presto Windows Server 2003desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 12.00closeWindows XPclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 12.0closeWindows XP closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 12.00closeWindows Server 2003 closecloseclosecloseclose0.06 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 12.0Presto 2.9.181Windows Windows NT 5.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.429 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Labs 12.00Presto 2.9.181Windows Server 2003desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 12.00closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.16closeLinux x86_64 Desktopcloseclose0.011 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:01 | by ThaDafinser