User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_9_5) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Spotify/1.0.8.59 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_ua.yaml
Spotify 1.0.8 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Safari WebKit MacOSX 10.9AppleMacintoshDesktop0.164 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 537.36closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari 537.36closeOS X 10.9.5desktop-browsercloseclose0.255 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Safari WebKit Mac 10.9desktop0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari closeOS X 10.9.5closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Spotify 1.0.8closeMac OS X 10.9.5closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeOS X 10.9.5closecloseclosecloseclose0.078 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Safari WebKit 537.36Mac OS X 10.9.5closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.406 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Safari Webkit 537.36OS X Mavericks 10.9desktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Safari 8.0closeFedora Desktopcloseclose0.011 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:01 | by ThaDafinser