User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win3.1; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020530
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_os.yaml
Windows 3.1 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Mozilla 1.0Gecko 1.0 Desktop0.036 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Mozilla rv:1.0.0closeWindows desktop-browsercloseclose0.18 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Windows desktop0.01 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 1.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeWindows 3.1 closeclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Mozilla 1.0.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.186 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Mozilla 1.0.0Gecko 20020530Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.403 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Gecko 1.0.0Windows desktopcloseclose0.007 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:41:00 | by ThaDafinser