User agent detail

BIRD V750/1.00 Nucleus RTOS/V1.11.19 MTK6227/06A Release/12.28.2006 Browser/Teleca Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
BirdV750 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
BIRD closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Obigo closeJVM BirdV750mobile-browseryescloseclose0.284 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Obigo MTK / Nucleus BirdV750feature phoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
Teleca Browser close BirdV750closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Teleca-Obigo close closecloseclosecloseclose0.05 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
No result found
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Obigo BirdV750mobile:featureyescloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Java Applet close BirdV750Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.026 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:58 | by ThaDafinser