User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; YunOs 1.0.0.3; en-; K-Touch W619 Build/AliyunOs-2012) AppleWebKit/533.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Mobile Safari/533.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/smartphone-1.yml
Mobile Safari 4.0YunOs 1.0.0.3WebKit K-TouchW619smartphone Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android 4.0WebKit Android Mobile Phoneyesyes0.02 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Mobile Safari 4.0closeLinux mobile-browseryescloseclose0.268 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Mobile Safari 4.0WebKit YunOs 1.0K-TouchW619smartphoneyes0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari 4.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Safari 4.0closeLinux KtouchW619closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari 4.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.046 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
WebKit 533.1Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.401 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Aliyun Browser Webkit 533.1Aliyun OS 1.0.0K-TouchW619mobile:smartyescloseclose0.02 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.009 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:58 | by ThaDafinser