User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.17 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/24.0.1312.57 Safari/537.17
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/desktop.yml
Chrome 24.0.1312.57Windows 8WebKit desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 24.0WebKit Win8 6.2Windows DesktopDesktop0.038 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 24.0.1312.57closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 24.0.1312.57closeWindows 6.2desktop-browsercloseclose0.182 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 24.0WebKit Windows 8desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 24.0.1312.57closeWindows 8closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 24.0.1312closeWindows 8 closeclosecloseclose0.012 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 24.0.1312.57closeWindows 8 closecloseclosecloseclose0.068 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 24.0.1312.57WebKit 537.17Windows Windows NT 6.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.408 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 24Webkit 537.17Windows 8desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 24.0.1312.57closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 24.0.1312.52closeUnknown Desktopcloseclose0.018 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:56 | by ThaDafinser