User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; 2.3.4; en-us; X500 Build/GINGERBREAD) AppleWebKit/533.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Safari/533.1 MyDealerApp
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SonyEricssonX500 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android 4.0WebKit Android 2.3Mobile Phoneyesyes0.171 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari 4.0closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.194 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Safari 4.0WebKit GNU/Linux desktop0.01 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari 4.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Safari 4.0closeLinux SonyEricssonX500closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari 4.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.062 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
WebKit 533.1Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.406 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Webkit 533.1Android 2.3closeclose0.01 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:56 | by ThaDafinser