User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 2.3.3; zh-cn; C8650 Build/HuaweiC8650; 320*480) AppleWebKit/528.5+ (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.1.2 Mobile Safari/525.20.1/UCWEB7.9.3.103/139/32160
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
HuaweiC8650 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android 3.1WebKit Android 2.3Mobile Phoneyesyes0.098 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 3.1.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 3.1.2closeAndroid 2.3.3GenericAndroid 2.3mobile-browseryescloseclose0.258 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 7.9WebKit Android 2.3HuaweiC8650smartphoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 3.1.2closeAndroid 2.3.3closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 7.9.3closeAndroid 2.3.3HuaweiC8650closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 7.9.3.103closeAndroid 2.3.3closecloseclosecloseclose0.145 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 7.9.3.103WebKit 528.5Android 2.3.3closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.544 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 7.9Webkit 528.5Android 2.3.3HuaweiC8650mobile:smartyescloseclose0.02 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 3.1.2closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 2.3closeAndroid 2.3Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.026 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:55 | by ThaDafinser