User agent detail

Mozilla/3.01 (X11; I; SunOS 4.1.3-JL sun4m)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/os-solaris.yaml
Netscape Navigator 3.0.1Solaris 1.1 desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Netscape 3.0Gecko SunOS Desktop0.006 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Netscape Navigator 3.0.1closeSolaris 1.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.204 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Solaris 4.1desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 3.01closeSunOS closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeSolaris closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Netscape Navigator 3.1 SunOS SunSPARCstationcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Netscape Navigator 3.0.1 Solaris 1.1desktopcloseclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
closeLinux Japan Radio CompanyWX330JFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.012 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:55 | by ThaDafinser