User agent detail

Opera/9.80 (Linux armv6l; Opera TV Store/5580;) Presto/2.10.250 Version/11.60 Model/Samsung-BD-F5500
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/television/samsung.yaml
Opera Devices 3.2 Presto 2.10.250SamsungBD-F5500 Blu-ray Playertelevision Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 11.60Presto 2.10Linux Smartphone OS Linux DesktopDesktop0.008 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 11.60closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 9.80closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.18 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 11.60Presto GNU/Linux SamsungBD-F5500tv0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 11.60 Model/Samsung-BD-F5500closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 11.60closeLinux SamsungBD-F5500closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 11.60closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.064 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 11.60Presto 2.10.250Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.415 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Devices 3.2Presto 2.10.250 SamsungBD-F5500 Blu-ray Playertelevisioncloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 11.60closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.11closeLinux armv7l SmartTVSmart-TVcloseclose0.007 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:54 | by ThaDafinser