User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 2.3.4; en-us; ADR6400L 4G Build/GRJ22) AppleWebKit/533.1 (KHTML
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/smartphone-1.yml
Android Browser Android 2.3.4WebKit HTCThunderBoltsmartphone Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 533.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Browser closeAndroid 2.3.4HTCThunderbolt 4Gmobile-browseryescloseclose0.258 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 2.3HTCThunderBoltsmartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid 2.3.4closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 2.3.4closeAndroid 2.3.4HTCADR6400L 4Gcloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Webkit based browser WebKit 533.1Android 2.3.4closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.422 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Webkit 533.1Android 2.3.4HTCThunderbolt 4Gmobile:smartyescloseclose0.017 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android 2.3closeAndroid 2.3HTCADR6400LSmartphoneyesyescloseclose0.041 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:54 | by ThaDafinser