User agent detail

Lenovo_O3_TD/2.0 OPhone/2.0 (Linux; Android 2.0) Release/9.1.2009 Browser/WAP 2.0 (AppleWebKit/528.5+) Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
LenovoO3_TD Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 528.5closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Browser closeAndroid 2.0LenovoO3mobile-browseryescloseclose0.288 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 2.0LenovoO3smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid 2.0closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 2.0closeAndroid 2.0LenovoO3_TDcloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Webkit based browser WebKit 528.5Android 2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.406 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Webkit 528.5Android 2.0LenovoO3mobile:smartyescloseclose0.021 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android 3.6closeAndroid 3.6Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.044 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:53 | by ThaDafinser