User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (DirectFB; U; Linux 7630; en) AppleWebKit/531.2+ (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/531.2+ HbbTV/1.1.1 ( ;LGE ;GLOBAL_PLAT3 ;BR.8.97.067.B ;1.0.0.1 ;)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/tv.yml
Safari GNU/Linux WebKit LGGLOBAL PLAT3tv Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 531.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari 531.2closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.19202 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Safari WebKit GNU/Linux LGGLOBAL PLAT3tv0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
HbbTV 1.1.1closeLinux LGGLOBAL_PLAT3closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.05901 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
WebKit 531.2Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Webkit 531.2 LGNetCast TV 2012televisioncloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.11closeLinux armv7l SmartTVSmart-TVcloseclose0.009 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:52 | by ThaDafinser