User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:11.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/11.0 CometBird/11.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/desktop.yml
CometBird 11.0Windows 8Gecko desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
CometBird 11.0Gecko 11.0Win8 6.2Windows DesktopDesktop0.015 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 11.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
CometBird 11.0closeWindows 6.2desktop-browsercloseclose0.19302 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
CometBird 11.0Gecko Windows 8desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firefox 11.0closeWindows 8closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Firefox 11.0closeWindows 8 closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
CometBird 11.0closeWindows 8 closecloseclosecloseclose0.05901 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
CometBird 11.0Gecko 20100101Windows Windows NT 6.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
CometBird 11.0Gecko 11.0Windows 8desktopcloseclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 11.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Firefox 11.0closeWindows 8Desktopcloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:52 | by ThaDafinser