User agent detail

HbbTV/1.1.1 (; CUS:MEDION; MB70; 1.0; 1.0;) LOH; Opera; CE-HTML/1.0 NetFront/4.1 NETRANGEMMH
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
MEDIONMB70 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
NetFront 4.1NetFront Mobile Deviceyes0.014 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera CEcloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
NetFront 4.1close GenericSmartTVmobile-browseryescloseclose0.17802 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
NetFront 4.1NetFront MedionMB70tv0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 1.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
HbbTV 1.1.1close MEDIONMB70closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera close closecloseclosecloseclose0.051 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41004 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
NetFront 4.1 MedionMB70televisioncloseclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.11closeLinux armv7l SmartTVSmart-TVcloseclose0.011 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:52 | by ThaDafinser