User agent detail

UCWEB/2.0(BlackBerry; U; 6.6.0.236; en-us; 9700/6.6.0.236) U2/1.0.0 UCBrowser/8.1.0.216 U2/1.0.0 Mobile
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-687.php
UC Browser 8.1RIM OS unknownunknown RIMBoldMobile Phoneyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 8.1U2 RIM OS RIMBoldMobile Phoneyes0.018 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
UCWEB 2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
BlackBerry Browser closeRIM OS mobile-browseryescloseclose0.17902 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 8.1 BlackBerry OS RIMBlackBerrysmartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
BlackBerry 6.6.0.236)closeBlackBerry closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 8.1.0closeBlackBerry OS BlackBerrycloseclosecloseclose0.009 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 2.0closeBlackBerryOS 1.0.0closecloseclosecloseclose0.08601 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
BlackBerry Browser BlackBerry OS BlackBerryBlackBerrycloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 8.1Gecko BlackBerry OS RIMBlackBerry Bold 9700mobile:smartyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.007 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:52 | by ThaDafinser