User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/44.0.2403.157 UBrowser/5.5.7045.1004 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-uc.yaml
UC Browser 5.5Windows VistaBlink 537.36desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 44.0Blink WinVista 6.0Windows DesktopDesktop0.021 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 44.0.2403.157closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 44.0.2403.157closeWindows 6.0desktop-browsercloseclose0.19902 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 44.0Blink Windows Vistadesktop0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 44.0.2403.157closeWindows Vistaclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 44.0.2403closeWindows Vista closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 44.0.2403.157closeWindows Vista closecloseclosecloseclose0.23702 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 44.0.2403.157WebKit 537.36Windows Windows NT 6.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41004 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 5.5Blink Windows Vistadesktopcloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 44.0.2403.157closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 44.0.2403.125closeWindows 7Desktopcloseclose0.015 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:52 | by ThaDafinser