User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 2.2.1; en-us; Alcatel one touch 990 Build/FRF91) AppleWebKit/533.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Mobile Safari/533.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
AlcatelOne Touch 990 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android 4.0WebKit Android 2.2Mobile Phoneyesyes0.026 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 2.2.1Alcatelone touch 990smobile-browseryescloseclose0.25102 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 2.2AlcatelOne Touch 990smartphoneyes0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 2.2.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 2.2.1closeAndroid 2.2.1AlcatelOne Touch 990closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 2.2.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.05 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser 4.0WebKit 533.1Android 2.2.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Webkit 533.1Android 2.2.1AlcatelOne Touch 990mobile:smartyescloseclose0.007 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
closeLinux Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.044 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:52 | by ThaDafinser