User agent detail

Samsung/SGH-i550V/BUGL2 Series60/3.1 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungSGH-i550V Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Samsung SGHcloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
closeSeries60 3.1Samsungi550mobile-browseryescloseclose0.27903 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Nokia OSS Browser 3.1 Symbian OS Series 60 3.1SamsungSGH-i550Vsmartphoneyes0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
Nokia OSS Browser 3.1close SamsungSGH-i550Vcloseclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Browser for S60 OSS 3.1close closecloseclosecloseclose0.051 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Symbian Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41004 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Series60 3.1Samsungi550mobile:smartyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Java Applet close SamsungSGH i560Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.024 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:52 | by ThaDafinser