User agent detail

Nokia303/5.0 (13.44) Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 Mozilla/5.0 AppleWebKit/420+ (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/420+
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/manufacturer-nokia-series40.yaml
Series40 Webkit 420NokiaAsha 303mobile:featureyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Nokia NokiaMobile Phoneyes0.025 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 420closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari 420close desktop-browsercloseclose0.18702 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Nokia Browser WebKit Symbian Nokia303smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Nokia Browser 5.0closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Nokia Services (WAP) Browser close Nokia303closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari close closecloseclosecloseclose0.05801 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Safari WebKit 420NokiaOS NokiaNokia 303closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Webkit 420Series40 NokiaAsha 303mobile:featureyescloseclose0.009 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Java Applet close NokiaAsha 303Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.023 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:51 | by ThaDafinser