User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (Brew MP 1.0.2; U; en-us; Sanyo; NetFront/3.5.1/AMB) Boost SCP6780
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/feature_phone.yml
NetFront 3.5.1Brew 1.0.2NetFront SanyoInnuendofeature phone Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
NetFront 3.5NetFront Brew 2.0Mobile Deviceyes0.016 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
NetFront 3.5.1close SanyoSCP6780mobile-browseryescloseclose0.17902 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
NetFront 3.5NetFront Brew 1.0SanyoInnuendofeature phoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 4.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
NetFront 3.5.1closeBrew MP 1.0.2closeclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
NetFront 3.5.1close closecloseclosecloseclose0.06701 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
NetFront closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
NetFront 3.5.1 Brew MP 1.0.2SanyoInnuendomobile:featureyescloseclose0.007 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
NetFront 3.5close SanyoSCP6780Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.085 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:51 | by ThaDafinser