User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Maemo; Linux armv7l; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120607 Firefox/13.0 Fennec/13.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-maemo.yaml
Firefox Mobile Fennec 13.0Maemo Gecko 13.0mobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Fennec 13.0Gecko 13.0Linux Smartphone OS Mobile Phoneyes0.014 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 13.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Mobile Firefox 13.0closeLinux NokiaGeneric Maemo with Fennecmobile-browseryescloseclose0.18802 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Fennec 13.0Gecko Maemo yes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firefox 13.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Firefox Mobile 13.0closeMaemo closeclosecloseclose0.01 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Fennec 13.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.08001 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Fennec 13.0Gecko 20120607Maemo closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41304 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Firefox Mobile Fennec 13.0Gecko 13.0Maemo mobile:smartyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 13.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Firefox 17.0closeMaemo NokiaGeneric Maemo with FennecFeature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:50 | by ThaDafinser