User agent detail

LinkStar Research Crawler (http://linkstar.com/),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_ua.yaml
Research Crawler Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesGeneric Research CrawlerBot/Crawler0.015 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
LinkStar closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
No result found
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
yes0.002 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesResearch Crawlerclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Links close closecloseclosecloseclose0.05101 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Links closeclosecloseclosecloseclose3.70337 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
No result found
Woothee
v1.2.0
closecloseclosecloseclosecloseyesclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:50 | by ThaDafinser