User agent detail

VMVID Android Application (13, vmvid v2.1) - TCT ALCATEL ONE TOUCH 5035D TCT - 00000000-693D-740E-FFFF-FFFFD769F97E
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
ALCATELONE TOUCH 5035D Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
VMVID closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Browser closeAndroid mobile-browseryescloseclose0.29803 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android AlcatelONE TOUCH 5035D TCT - 00000000-693D-740E-FFFF-FFFFD769F97Esmartphoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeAndroid ALCATELONE TOUCH 5035Dcloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Stock Android Browser Android closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Android mobile:smartyescloseclose0.147 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android 3.6closeAndroid 3.6Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.042 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:49 | by ThaDafinser