User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 107) AppleWebKit/534.48.3 (KHTML like Gecko) Version/5.1 Safari/534.48.3
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-224.php
yesFake SafariBot/Crawler Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesFake SafariBot/Crawler0.046 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 5.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari 5.1closeOS X 107desktop-browsercloseclose0.22202 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Safari 5.1WebKit Mac desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari 5.1closeOS X 107closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Safari 5.1closeMac OS X closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari 5.1closeOS X closecloseclosecloseclose0.09401 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Safari 5.1WebKit 534.48.3Mac OS X 107closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Safari 5.1Webkit 534.48.3OS X 107desktopcloseclose0.006 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 5.1closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Safari 5.1.3closeMac OS X Desktopcloseclose0.012 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:49 | by ThaDafinser