User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Android; Linux armv7l; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110603 Firefox/5.0 Fennec/5.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-635.php
Fennec 5.0Android unknown2.0 unknowngeneral Mobile PhoneMobile Phoneyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Fennec 5.0Gecko 2.0Android Mobile Phoneyes0.042 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 5.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Mobile Firefox 5.0closeAndroid MozillaFirefox for Androidmobile-browseryescloseclose0.18302 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Fennec 5.0Gecko Android yes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firefox 5.0closeAndroid closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Firefox Mobile 5.0closeAndroid closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Fennec 5.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.11101 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Fennec 5.0Gecko 20110603Android closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40804 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Firefox Mobile Fennec 5.0Gecko 5.0Android mobile:smartyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 5.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Firefox Mobile 10.0closeLinux MozillaSmartphoneyesyescloseclose0.01 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:49 | by ThaDafinser