User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; Gecko/20041115) Maple 5.0.0 Navi
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/tv.yml
Gecko SamsungSmart TV 2009tv Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
close media-playercloseclose0.19802 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Samsungtv0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 4.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
No result found
UserAgentStringCom
Mozilla 5.0.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.06501 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Netscape Navigator 4.0Gecko 20041115 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.37304 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Gecko SamsungSmart TV 2009televisioncloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:48 | by ThaDafinser