User agent detail

UCWEB/2.0 (Linux; U; Adr 4.0.1; en-US; Celkon_A8+) U2/1.0.0 UCBrowser/8.6.0.318 U2/1.0.0 Mobile
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
CelkonA8+ Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 8.6U2 Android 4.0Mobile Phoneyesyes0.015 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
UCWEB 2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser closeLinux CelkonA97imobile-browseryescloseclose0.26603 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 8.6 Android 4.0CelkonA8+smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 8.6.0closeAndroid 4.0.1CelkonA8+closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 2.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.07601 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 8.6.0.318 Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41804 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 8.6Gecko Android 4.0.1CelkonA8+mobile:smartyescloseclose0.014 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 8closeAndroid 4.0Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:48 | by ThaDafinser