User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 Gecko/2009042316 Firefox/2.0.0.x
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-513.php
yesFake FirefoxBot/Crawler Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesFake FirefoxBot/Crawler0.023 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 2.0.0.xcloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Firefox close desktop-browsercloseclose0.18002 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Firefox 2.0Gecko 0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firefox 2.0.0.xclose closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Firefox 2.0.0close closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Firefox 2.0.0.xclose closecloseclosecloseclose0.048 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Firefox 2.0.0.xGecko 2009042316 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41104 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Firefox 2.0.0Gecko desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 2.0.0.closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Desktopcloseclose0.008 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:48 | by ThaDafinser