User agent detail

Reeder/2.1.1 CFNetwork/672.0.8 Darwin/14.0.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-651.php
Reeder 2.1iOS 7.0unknown Applegeneral Mobile DeviceMobile Deviceyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Reeder 2.1WebKit iOS 7.0AppleMobile Deviceyesyes0.01 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Reeder 2.1.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Reeder 2.1.1closeiOS feed-readercloseclose0.19102 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Reeder 2.1 iOS 7.0yes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
CFNetwork 672.0.8closeiOS 7.0Applecloseclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Darwin closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Reeder 2.1.1 iOS 7.0.3mobile:smartyescloseclose0.007 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Mobile Safari 7.0closeiOS 7.0AppleiPhoneSmartphoneyesyescloseclose0.019 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:40:47 | by ThaDafinser